Sure enough, Liu Xingting is the one who understands himself best. Now this group of people, although they may have believed a little under his "bombing in turn", but to achieve the effect of healing
I don't even have that kind of wholehearted recognition. Otherwise, why would images that I don't want appear in my mind from time to time.
Sincerity leads to spirit, the most common saying in Buddhism, it must have some truth. After all, Buddhism is true!
At this time, Liu Xingting's voice sounded really indescribably comfortable.
¡ª¡ª"Does the spirit of sincerity exist?
Just like what you eat to make up for what you eat, sincerity leads to spirit is also a saying that many people talk about, but it is not accepted by modern science and logic systems. The reason is very simple, this statement may not be falsified in nature.
Whether a person is sincere or not, outsiders seem to have no way to judge objectively. For example, before the exam, you go to worship the Bodhisattva. If you pass the exam, it can be interpreted as the manifestation of the Bodhisattva. It makes sense anyway.
Since it is reasonable to say what you say, the reasonable attitude is to keep a respectful distance and not to fight with you. However, in the field of life sciences, there is really a serious issue related to sincerity leads to spirit, which cannot be bypassed casually.
It is the so-called 'placebo effect'.
Chu Lihua should have shared this concept with everyone. What it says is that in many cases, even if a patient is given a 'fake drug' such as starch or saline, as long as the person thinks that he is using the real drug, it can relieve the disease.
For this reason, when developing new drugs and conducting human clinical trials, a step is generally required, which is to carry out randomized controlled double-blind trials-let two groups of patients use real drugs and placebos and fake drugs, but do not tell them to use them themselves. Whether the drug is genuine or counterfeit, and then compare the changes in the condition of the two groups of patients.
This method can effectively eliminate the interference of the placebo effect and confirm whether a new drug is useful and how useful it is.
The biological nature of the placebo effect is still not particularly clear, but we must face up to its existence. Because at some point, especially for neurological conditions like pain, depression, and insomnia, the placebo effect is too strong to ignore.
It can even be compared to many real medicines.
The placebo effect is amazing, right? But what comes next may strike you as even more incredible.
In some specific diseases, even if you directly tell the patient that he is given a placebo without drug ingredients, as long as you tell him the existence of the placebo effect at the same time, it can actually relieve the disease. This is the so-called 'non-deceptive placebo' concept.
Everyone, is this phenomenon particularly similar to "Sincerity leads to spirit?" There is something, even if we know it is false, as long as we choose to believe it, it can be useful.
Of course, the difference between the two is that sincerity leads to spirit is an unfalsifiable statement, and we still have the opportunity to study clearly what is the non-deceptive placebo.
A traditional approach to confirming the effects of non-deceptive placebos is to directly ask patients how they feel.
For example, researchers can give patients a non-deceptive placebo, such as a tablet made of starch, and ask the patient if they feel better after a while.
In fact, many such studies have been done, and it is indeed found that there are many diseases and many patients will feel better even if they know that they have used fake medicines.
But one of the big problems with this type of research is that we don't know if patients actually get better when they say they're better.
After all, humans are complex intelligent creatures, how do we know that these patients are not deliberately pandering to the disappointment of researchers? Isn't the condition itself slowly improving?
Or the human brain is so good at making up brains, so that although these patients are still in pain, they lie to themselves that they are getting better, so that they believe it?
In other words, we lack an objective measure that does not rely on subjective patient descriptions to demonstrate that the non-deceptive placebo effect is real. "
Although Liu Xingting's words were a bit convoluted, it made Chu Lihua suddenly enlightened.
Yes, I just thought to tell myself, tell everyone, the efficacy of positive psychology and the placebo effect.
However, I have ignored the thoughts that have been suppressed in myself and everyone's heart. Are these really reliable?
Can a few simple examples prove it?
At this moment, Liu Xingting set off such confusion on purpose, making everyone sleepy.Confused, thinking; and then a little bit to reveal the answer.
Isn't there such a saying?
Only opinions that can be falsified are trustworthy.
This is the reason why I have always disliked Qing Yunfei, right?
Qing Yunfei always said that he didn't want to listen. Not wanting to admit it, even being afraid of that possibility.
However, is avoidance the solution to the problem?
Obviously I have doubts, but I just press deep in my heart and deliberately don't think about it; but, does it really not exist?
Shouldn't the correct approach be to break through the fog and find the truth?
When everyone's emotions were almost fermented, Liu Xingting continued, "Not long ago, researchers from the University of Michigan and other institutions in the United States published a paper in the journal Nature-Communications, which proved for the first time that non-deception The existence of the sexual placebo effect. Sincerity really works.¡±
"Sincerity really can work."
"Sincerity really can work."
"Sincerity really can work."
Chu Lihua didn't know about other people, anyway, these words kept echoing in her mind, they were researched by the United States!
Xincheng can really work!
This time, Liu Xingting only paused for a while and continued.
¡ª¡ª"The researcher's experimental design is actually quite simple:
They took a group of college students as subjects and asked them to look at random pictures that appeared on a computer screen.
Some are non-emotional pictures, such as a ball, a building; some are pictures with strong negative stimuli, such as a monster head, a bloody wound, a disaster scene, etc.
Then, ask students to rate their emotions, the more uncomfortable they feel, the higher the score. This is a subjective indicator.
At the same time, they also made an EEG recording for the students, measuring their brain wave signals (late positive potential, late positive potential) stimulated by strong emotional stimuli. This is an objective indicator of sentiment. "
Can pictures affect people's emotions?
The secret really has a scientific basis.
It is right to save the pictures of various desired scenarios in the early stage.
It's just because I don't believe it 100%, so although the effect can be seen, it is not that significant. (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com