Recently, I saw an article on the Internet about elders forwarding vulgar content links in family groups. Reprinted such news. I clicked in and read it carefully from beginning to end, and found a little resonance in it, because there is such an elder in our family group.
She will forward some content in the group from time to time, some titles are surprising, and some pictures are not very elegant, but she never seems to mind, she will always forward to the group from time to time, of course, no one has ever responded to these messages .
Today, she reposted a link in the group, and the title was still a surprise, as if the world would end soon. Because I just got a little impatient reading the book, I clicked on the link to browse it, and I had the right to take a rest. The content of the link probably said that looking at mobile phones for a long time has a high risk of eye cancer, and cited several examples to try to prove this statement. I am not a doctor. I don¡¯t know if playing with mobile phones for a long time will cause eye cancer, but I saw a few mistakes in the article. The first is that a certain media source in one of the sources does not exist at all, and the second is the example in the article Neither can prove that there is a relationship between eye problems and eye cancer. With doubts, I went to Baidu on the Internet for "eye cancer", and found that there was a targeted video on the Internet to refute the rumors. It was a news released by a certain local legal channel. It is a rumor that eye cancer is caused by gene mutation. Then Baidu Encyclopedia, there is this cause: the main cause of the disease is genetic factors. It can be deduced from this that what she forwarded was a false news, which is also a push for the spread of rumors.
Not only did she forward unreliable news, but she also sent some QR codes of WeChat official accounts. As a junior, she was too embarrassed to refuse, but after paying attention, I found that some of the articles contained vulgar and pornographic elements, so I clicked in and reported the article , and reported it together with the official account. A few days later, the official account platform sent me a message saying that the publisher had deleted the article. As for whether the official account has been dealt with, I don't know, because I have already unfollowed it. At that time, I didn't think about whether I should tell her that these official accounts were not credible, and recommend some reliable mainstream media or self-media to her. But today I started to think: Should I tell her that this is false news, that this official account is an official account that spreads false news? And should I fulfill my responsibility and obligation to guide her to obtain information from credible channels?
Intuition tells me: don't be troublesome. After some thinking, I found that the root of this idea lies in "sophistication of the world". If it was my parents, I would point it out to them without hesitation, but if it was related but not close enough to speak freely, I would have deep concerns. Because I know that my parents will trust me unconditionally, but not necessarily for other people. If the other party is open-minded, it¡¯s okay to say, but for those who are not open-minded or broad-minded enough, they may not accept these suggestions, and they may even make me feel uncomfortable. A rift arose between the two sides. After some ideological struggle, I finally chose to ignore this message and let her or other elders continue to forward it like this until someone reminded them.
Previously, I saw a touching point of view on the tweets of the official account: when they were young, they brought us to know the world, and now we want to lead them to know the online world. The main target here should be people who have such a close relationship with their children and parents, grandchildren and grandparents, but what about others? Or what about people who have a certain relationship but are not close enough? Or we can think about this question from another angle: When we see that a child lacks a certain knowledge or ability, should we educate them instead of their parents? In fact, many of us will choose to be a "wise" bystander. But the reason for making this choice is that we just can't break free from the shackles of worldliness and assume a share of responsibility.
It is the responsibility of all young people to guide the elders to surf the Internet safely, distinguish the authenticity of online information, and keep them from getting lost in the online world, but we often avoid this responsibility. So the elders are lost in the online world, and we young people should also take a responsibility. (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com