-
Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading
Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in hlnovel.com -> Comics -> I m picking up pieces in PlayerUnknown s Battlegrounds Chapter 2247 The song was plagiarized?
Previous page Return to Catalog Next page
- You can search "I am picking up fragments in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds" on Baidu to find the latest chapter!
But while Jiang Siming was preparing for the game at home, a piece of bad news spread on the Internet.
That is after Jiang Siming won the Grammy Award, many people began to plagiarize his songs.
???????????????????????????????????????????? To have brought his original song, copied the music score, changed the lyrics, written it into a new song, and then made a great show of saying that this song was composed by him.
His "Old Enemy", "Why Not", "Luzhou Moon", "If Then", etc., these songs have all been pirated and plagiarized.
?? These batches randomly changed a little tune, then changed the lyrics, and applied it, and it became their work.
There are even people who openly charge for plagiarized songs on major music platforms.
¡°If Jiang Si hadn¡¯t broadcast live tomorrow and found out that many fans were reporting this on the barrage, he would still have been kept in the dark.
"These guys are like shepherds of wool, plucking away at his fat sheep.
Even Jiang Siming¡¯s English and Japanese songs were taken and changed into Chinese songs, and they showed off everywhere that they wrote them themselves.
After knowing the news, Jiang Siming didn¡¯t want to spoil them at all.
It doesn¡¯t matter if you copy his English or Japanese songs, but copying his Song brother¡¯s songs is not okay!
He worked hard to bring Brother Song¡¯s songs to everyone, and didn¡¯t want Song¡¯s classic songs to be buried.
He has never thought about making money from Song Ge's songs. In fact, he didn't make a fortune specifically from music, he relied on games.
Music is really not even his hobby. When he first started doing live broadcasts, he sang a few songs and gained a lot of fans.
I don¡¯t want fans to be disappointed and sad after waiting for no results, and I don¡¯t want those disappeared classic songs to be buried.
It¡¯s only now that I have free time, I occasionally put out a song to give back to the fans.
¡° If Jiang Siming really wants to make money from music, then the songs he has produced in the past few years, even if they are all paid, can earn him at least several billion.
But Jiang Siming has never charged any fees. Any of his songs are free and can be listened to for free no matter which platform they are on.
Even foreign music platforms are the same.
Even when he released his first album, Jiang Siming only charged cost. Each album was sold at a reasonable price, and the production was very sophisticated.
Jiang Siming believes that these songs are not his own anyway, and he does not need tens of billions of dollars, so he has never thought of making money from them, so he plays the songs for free.
And every time I sing a new song on a show or live broadcast, I will find time to go to the company to sing a complete recorded version so that everyone can listen more comfortably.
But now, many people have noticed that Jiang Siming seems to have no concern for the music and is very casual.
Started plagiarizing the songs he put out one by one.
??Among them, the Song Ge songs played by Jiang Siming were the most severely plagiarized. Almost every song had several plagiarized similar songs.
For example, the most popular song right now is the one that was bold enough to change into a paid version of "Simple Happiness", which is a copy of "Why Not" that Jiang Siming sang before.
The music melody in the 56th to 59th second of the song "Simple Happiness" is actually the accompaniment of the 17th to 21st and 52nd to 57th seconds of "Why Not". If you sing it, you will find a seamless connection.
Then comes the chorus of "Simple Happiness". One of the lyrics: "Ordinary happiness, there will be no more loneliness" is exactly the same as "Singing this song for you, there is no style" in "Why Not".
At the same time, "No matter how long the journey is, wait until the next stop is over" and "It just means, I want to give you happiness" in "Why Not", the singing style and tone of the first sentence are exactly the same, but the pitch of the second sentence is raised.
Finally, there is the processing of the tail sound at the end of the song "Simple Happiness", which is also similar to "Why Not".
After listening to Luo Si¡¯s ¡°Simple Happiness¡±, many people also said that the melodies of the two songs are really close.
Some netizens commented that the two songs cannot be said to be unrelated, they can only be said to be exactly the same.
"Simple Happiness" sung by Luo Cun is more like an out-of-tune version of "Why Not". In comparison, it's really jarring.
This classic song by Brother Song was taken over by this Internet celebrity who is not even a singer, and he abruptly changed the lyrics into a "new song" that is full of low coffee flavor.
It has also been put on major music platforms and played for a fee.
Before Jiang Siming knew about it, he had many fans.??I pointed out to the singer named "Luo Si" that he plagiarized "Why Not".
However, this stupid Luo not only did not admit his mistake, but he said righteously that he did not plagiarize, and even started fighting with Jiang Siming's fans.
The most ridiculous thing is that this idiot¡¯s company also issued warnings on Gulu with great fanfare.
"Now our company solemnly declares that there is no plagiarism in "Simple Happiness"! If anyone deliberately fabricates facts in the future, maliciously slanders our company and our singer Luo Si, and infringes on the reputation rights of our company and Luo Si, our company reserves the right to do so. The right to pursue their legal responsibilities!¡±
Under this Gulu Weibo, the company also posted the simplified scores of "Simple Happiness" and "Why Not" for comparison.
This is really a fucking joke, and there are people who use simplified musical notation as evidence for comparison?
¡°You really treat everyone like a fool, and you do it openly, without any guilt at all.
They may almost believe that they have not plagiarized. After all, they have told so many lies that they start to believe that they are true.
The company and the singer also saw it. They believed that a busy man like Jiang Siming would never have time to care about whether a song was plagiarized or not.
Jiang Siming has never taken his songs seriously, never charged fees, and has never asked anyone to charge fees. This shows that Jiang Siming never takes his songs seriously.
What are you afraid of? Copy it! Copy boldly!
He is even bold enough to publicly threaten Jiang Siming¡¯s fans and threaten to pursue legal responsibility against Jiang Siming¡¯s fans if they continue to slander them.
What it means is that if you dare to plagiarize us again, we will send you a lawyer's letter Oh no, it's a lawyer's letter!
"But Jiang Siming's fans are not easy to mess with. They are all affected by Jiang Siming's usual style of doing things. They accept soft things rather than hard words. Do you want to threaten me?" Then feel free to come!
Fans left messages under this Gulu Weibo post.
"Please lawyer, please han me! Come on, I also want to taste what it's like to be hanned by your lawyer."
"There are still such funny jokes in the world. The trick of calling a thief to catch a thief is really bad!"
¡°I can¡¯t say that these two songs are similar. I can only say that if it were a paper plagiarism check, there might be a 99% duplication rate.¡±
"So professional! I knew that 8 measures should be the same for plagiarism, so I only copied 6. Professional team, awesome!"
"This is the first time I saw a simple music score being posted. I laughed so hard. Be more professional. Is there a way to make the staff public?"
¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤(Remember the website address: www.hlnovel.com - Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report
- Previous pageCatalogNext page