You can search for "Quick Travel: Retirement Guide" on Baidu to find the latest chapter!
Forum for lovers of ancient literature, romance group.
Ranked among the top ten most popular posts of the year.
"With all due respect, the romance literature of the last century is simply not as good as the romance literature of the new century!" ¡½
Posted by: I am a post-00s generation, and I have no intention of discriminating against the romance literature of the last century. This post is only for discussion and personal thoughts.
A long time ago, I have heard from the generation of the generation. I still have to see the romance of the last century. Only the romance of the last century has cultural connotation, depth, and can be called the work.
It¡¯s not like the romance novels written after the new century.
It is vulgar and vulgar, with no connotation. It can be written by anyone who can read. There is no way to compare it with the romance novels of the past, and it is impossible to read it.
For these reasons, I curiously searched for some older paper romance novels published in the middle or even late last century.
And read it roughly.
To be honest, I really don¡¯t understand where the self-confidence of those who admire the literature of the last century comes from. Those who say they value self-sacrifice and sacrifice themselves to move everyone, or that men have three wives and four concubines, and women scheming, and do not regard being a third person. The fourth person is ashamed of it, but is proud of it.
There are also disgusting concepts such as love being more important than life and being more important than other people's physical disabilities. What is it that is worthy of admiration?
If I remember correctly, someone had already proposed the four principles of women's self-respect, self-love, and self-reliance at the beginning of the last century. However, in the romance literature of the last century, I have rarely seen a few romance novels with protagonists like this. .
On the contrary, there are several traditional literatures.
The heroine in it is pretty good.
So I really want to say that the older something is, the more precious it is and the more valuable it is.
The more worthy of admiration.
There are more dross in the ancient times. Society has always been prosperous and vigorously developed. New things will eventually replace the old things. The various romance literature in the new century is by no means inferior to those in the past.
In the last century, there were few people who read, and even fewer women read. Therefore, the corresponding number of female writers and romance writers was naturally very few. In addition, there was also little entertainment information available to ordinary people at that time. There are some of the more famous romance writers of the last century.
If you put them in today's era.
Even if they can be famous, they will never be as famous as they were back then, because the number of people competing with them now is hundreds of times greater than in the past.
They are only better because of the better times.
The victory lies only in having fewer competitors, rather than in how excellent the literary works are and how far they are compared to those who come after them. I hope everyone knows that.
Everyone is welcome to speak and argue with me.
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª
First floor: When I was a child, I really liked to read the works of famous romance writers of the last century. However, when I got older, I realized that those things I watched when I was a child did not have a correct outlook on life.
But that¡¯s only part of it. There are still some authors who have very upright views, such as Du Xiaofang¡¯s works, so it¡¯s better not to kill all the romances of the last century. There are good works among the romances of the last century. There are also bad works, just like in new century romance novels, it is not the same, some are good and some are bad.
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª
Second floor: With all due respect, let¡¯s give a better example for the example above. Can Du Xiaofang be called a romance author? Has she ever written romance novels? When people write romance novels, it means that women can hold up half the sky. The novels she wrote are about women holding up half the sky. They almost reach the sky.
Either they will be single for the rest of their lives, or men will only be able to make ends meet and will never be as powerful as women.
So we always call her a female novelist, but she can¡¯t be considered a romance author at all.
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª
Third floor: I quite agree with what the poster said, which is to get rid of the halo of sentiment, nostalgia and celebrity that surrounds the more famous romance works of the last century.
In fact, it is not better than some of the current best-selling works, and it is only half as good as it is.
I think those works are better.
It¡¯s completely caused by various halos.
If you just change the name and publish it as a new work, the number of viewers and collections may not be as high as the new works of some generally best-selling authors.
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª
Fourth floor: I specifically refute the second floor.
Du Xiaofang¡¯s works were criticized as deviant back then. I didn¡¯t expect that after so many years, some people would still criticize her works and even try to separate her from being a romance author.
??Set another category for her.
You guys should have a little face.
Why do women in literary works have to be weaker than men? Why do heroines have to take care of their husbands and raise children when they fall in love? The male CEO who is pure and unmarried is called a cold male god, and the female CEO who is unmarried and unmarried is called a merciless man. The old aunt that people want, why should a woman only be a saint and witch of the devil's sect, not the leader of the devil's sect.
You can¡¯t be the leader of the martial arts league and be the best in the world.
Vaguely, I just saw Du Xiaofang's novels that could not help but have a man who could do it, and our women could do it.
And we have been fighting for it to this day!
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª
Seventy-eighth Floor: I think it is extremely unfair to use the so-called three views to evaluate literary works.
People in different eras have different thoughts.
Using the new century¡¯s ideological and three views to criticize the works of the last century is not the same as using the Shangfang sword of the previous dynasty to kill the officials of this dynasty.
It¡¯s so stupid and ridiculous!
If you really do this, then you can criticize all the so-called classics. After all, there are three wives and four concubines everywhere in those classics, killing people like hemp, and also killing many protected animals
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª
92nd Floor: Although I also don¡¯t agree with using the ideas of this century to criticize the works of the last century, the works of the last century are far inferior to this century in terms of literary quality and brilliance. I am Quite recognized.
There are more people who can read and more people who can write books, but there are also more shoddy works.
But the number of high-quality products has obviously also increased.
From a basic point of view, the works of the last century are far inferior to those of this century. Therefore, there is really no problem in saying that some famous artists of the last century took advantage of the times.
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª
123rd Floor: Regarding the issue of three perspectives, I really feel that Du Xiaofang seems to have traveled from a world of heroines. How do her works look like those from the early 1980s?
Even now, it is not conventional at all.
In recent years, dramas with female protagonists have become popular. Among all the dramas with female protagonists that have been adapted from novels, only the copyrights of the ones Du Xiaofang sold were written in the last century. The others are all works in the new century.
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª
1120th floor: Now I know that Du Xiaofang writes so many independent novels about women because she was divorced.
It seems that it is true that the author's personal experience will affect her works. The author's works will not only be mixed with the author's thoughts, but may even be mixed with some of the author's personal experiences.