But I want to talk about this topic here, it's a bit of nonsense!
If you have nothing to do, just talk. To paraphrase an idiom: "There is no lightness in the world, and idlers talk about it"; or, in the words of Mr. Lu Xun: "Lightness is indifferent to existence or non-existence. With light!"
what is love? In such a materialistic society, for most people, the so-called "love" is actually nothing more than "passion" most of the time. As soon as the "passion" disappears, the so-called "love" will follow suit. Those who understand love as a model of friendship, life and death, love and vows, are mostly misled by literary and artistic works such as film and television novels.
Filter out selfish desires and distracting thoughts, when we ask ourselves the so-called "love" that shocks the world and weeps ghosts and gods, I don't know how much innocence can be left in the true sense of "love"?
I do not deny that there is pure love in this society, which does not care about fame or fortune, and does not ask for anything in return! However, how many people can do such innocence? How many people can meet? Therefore, for most people, love is just something in the mirror. If you think about it, it is possible to be spotless, and its difficulty is comparable to that of dinosaur egg fossils hatching live dinosaurs.
So, is there any true love? I think that true pure and single-minded love did exist. So where does it exist? It existed in ancient times, in poetry, songs, film and television novels.
Ordinarily, the development of modern society has made people more free, so that people can pursue what they want, but the fact is just the opposite. why? In fact, while freedom is expanding, the degree of human greed and depravity is also expanding. The alienation of society leads to the alienation of human nature. This is not someone's fault, but the result of social development.
In the past, there was a saying called "only loyal love, no loyal marriage". According to the current way of social development, even "love" has fallen. After the materialization of human nature, it is pure nonsense to talk about pure love. In fact, when everyone is facing the same situation without love, there is no need to panic or lose, just face the reality squarely. Don't pretend, what are you pretending to be, are you pretending to be innocent? Your own filth can deceive others, but you can never deceive your own heart.
Nietzsche said that God is dead. In fact, to apply it, it can also be said that "love is dead". I want to emphasize that the love I am talking about here is pure love, without wanton desires, without selfish distractions that only know me but not others, regardless of fame and fortune, giving wholeheartedly, without expecting anything in return.
Therefore, if you want to talk about money, talk about money; if you want to talk about transactions, talk about deals; if you want to talk about contracts, talk about contracts; "Love" in the name of doing dirty things.
After talking about love, let's talk about marriage. It is said that "love is the grave of marriage".
First of all, as far as the actual situation is concerned, arranged marriages are not suitable for this article. At that time, marriage was very pure and had nothing to do with love. Most of them were just a contract, with some exceptions.
Second, you have to admit that most marriages are the result of accidents. You can understand this through film and television novels. Of course, you might as well do a field survey right away.
Marriages that occur because of passion, what is ruined is not love, but only passion.
Those who enter into marriage because of the will, what they ruin is not love, but their own life.
Therefore, it is a false proposition to say: "Love is the grave of marriage".
Love and marriage seem to have a causal relationship, but in fact, there is a long distance between the two.
Why is the phrase "love is the grave of marriage" regarded as a classic? That is, most people, in order to get married, must find a reason for marriage. "Love" actually became a "back" at this time and became a "victim". The best reason to get married is "love".
In fact, everyone knows well, where does so much real "love" come from? How many marriages are achieved because of true love?
These facts or phenomena tell us: Anyone who is buried by marriage is "hypocrisy", "duplicity", and "gossip".
Speaking of this, I must emphasize that in my opinion, love has no time limit. If it is true love, our body will die, and our spirit of love will die.God will live forever.
Therefore, those guys who say that love has a time limit must have misunderstood the concept and took "passion" or other "love" whose name is not known as love.
Since there is such a big distance between marriage and love, do we have to give up marriage completely, or underestimate marriage? In fact, it is not like this. I think the understanding of marriage can actually be simplified. Marriage is, first and foremost, a contractual relationship. Since it is a contract, both parties participating in the game must strictly abide by the rules of the game. The content of this kind of contract includes not only the rights and obligations stipulated by law, but also the written or unwritten moral constraints formed by society for a long time. Therefore, in the face of marriage, don't challenge the bottom line of morality, don't jump out of the legal framework, and earnestly fulfill your rights and obligations, that's fine.
Finally, let's talk about the law.
In fact, in this society, there are too many types and provisions of laws. Why did our parents' generation seldom pay attention to marriage laws. Why now, as soon as the interpretation of the Marriage Law was introduced, it caused such a wide discussion and caused such an uproar? Perhaps, many people's explanations are that it is because the marriage law is closely related to our lives. I can't help asking a question: Doesn't the marriage law in the past have much to do with our parents' generation? Also, are civil law, public safety law, and environmental protection law different from us? Why does everyone ignore these things? Actually, neither.
I think the reason why the reaction to the Marriage Law is so strong, first of all, is probably because we have too many selfish desires and distracting thoughts.
What everyone is fighting for is not loyalty to the morality of marriage. What they are fighting for is money-related things. This can only make marriage more transactional. The reflection on marriage in this world is still only on the material level. Not only can it not change the status quo, but it will only worsen it. The ugliness of marriage.
Regardless of men and women, since they look at their marriage with the idea of ????a transaction, then the division of property must be clear. At least I think that the interpretation of the Marriage Law has no gender bias in this regard.
Secondly, I think there is another reality, we have to admit that the moral quality of marriage in our society as a whole is declining step by step.
Women don't trust men; men don't trust women; everyone doesn't trust this society; this has led to many people's collective anxiety about marriage, so they focus on the legal provisions.
In fact, for those who have never divorced in their entire lives, and for those who have never planned to divorce in their entire lives, the provisions of the Marriage Law on property division have nothing to do with them. I think that when most people get married, they still think that they must join hands until they grow old. If so, what are we afraid of?
If you are going to get married with the attitude that you will definitely get divorced, then, first of all, I think your attitude should be criticized. With such an improper attitude, what do you expect marriage to give you? Secondly, you must never get married, so as not to cause harm to others and waste social resources.
Love is something I don't know.
Marriage is something I can't see clearly.
Law is something I don't understand at all.
But I have said so much here, even if I am serious nonsense! (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com