I have never hated feminists, because they/they are fighters for women's rights, and they/they are preachers who raise women's social status to be equal to or even higher than men.
However, it must be clear that the ranks of feminists are the same as all other social groups and groups, and there must be a large number of "false people" among them. For example, those who copy the so-called "feminist theory" mechanically; those who trumpet the so-called "feminist" with rigid and rotten thinking; People with ulterior motives in the process These "fake people" are not only despised, disgusted, but even hated.
In this world, since the moment humans appeared, there has been inequality between men and women, and it is still an undeniable fact until today. As for whether the phenomenon of inequality between men and women has changed in the long course of historical development, this is a matter of opinion, and there is no unified standard answer.
Just because the phenomenon and facts of inequality between men and women are clearly revealed, then, for those who have always believed in "all beings are equal" like myself, those believers, researchers, and practitioners of feminism in the true sense should be respected, support and appreciation.
?Based on the above cognition, it can be judged that if feminism is made into a superstition, then such feminist believers, researchers, and practitioners are really "insignificant"!
There was a female professor who studied women and made a splendid thesis and came to such a conclusion:
In Chinese characters, for those words with "female" in the radical, if the word is commendatory, then this word is a manifestation of men's lust; if this word is derogatory, then this word is contemptuous to women.
This may sound like a cold joke, but it is actually a sad example.
In fact, whether it is doing research or doing other things, fairness is both necessary and necessary. Break through preconceived prejudices and prejudices, speak with facts, and make decisions with justice, so as not to fall into the vicious circle of "the source is wrong, and the flow is all wrong".
Take the "foot binding" of women in the past as an example, in fact, it is not necessarily a man who came up with this idea.
Regarding the origin of foot binding, according to the opinions of historical researchers, there are several versions, one of which is that the empress of the Southern Tang Dynasty and his harem invented this unique custom in China.
The empress of the Southern Tang Dynasty, the unsuccessful emperor who wrote a first-class poem, I believe his aesthetic vision will not be bad.
The valuability of artists lies in their creative thinking. It is the ability of a successful artist to be able to find beauty in the subtleties.
? It is guessed that the empress of the Southern Tang Dynasty was playing with the harem in Da Nei, and praised the harem's little feet. Perhaps the speaker may be unintentional, but the listener is very intentional.
A few words from the empress of the Southern Tang Dynasty triggered the mutilation of women's feet for nearly a thousand years.
From accidental to habitual, from the strictly forbidden inner court compound to the ordinary people's homes, the prevalence of small feet is due to factors such as women not being independent and having to flatter men, and the superiority of men. The group characteristics of women like to follow trends, women love fashion, and women follow trends have a lot to do with each other. Therefore, there are of course men's reasons for this matter, but among them, women's constant self-thinking cannot be completely ignored.
According to relevant records and legends, the initial stage of foot binding is just to wrap the feet with cloth. At this stage, although the feet are restrained, it has not yet reached the point where the muscles and bones are injured or the limbs are mutilated.
In fact, in reality, no matter in the past or now, women's comparisons, rivalries, jealousy are all driven by fashion trends and carried out in the name of "beauty".
Think about it, with regard to foot binding, just wrapping it with cloth probably cannot solve the problem fundamentally. If a girl is born with a pair of exquisite feet, that's fine, but if she is wrapped in cloth, she will definitely look smaller; if God bestows her with a pair of three-foot feet, then there is no need to resort to extraordinary measures to make these feet smaller, which is in harmony with the pair of feet. It is completely impossible to compete against the delicate.
It can be guessed again that the source of the bound feet is in the palace, so the starting point of the disabled feet should also be in the palace. Those women in the deep palace who have no worries about food and clothing and wait for favors all day long, in order to attract luck, go out of their way to torture their feet, which seems to have become a natural thing. This is just a conjecture, and the actual situation remains to be studied and verified.
According to the general manifestations of human nature and referring to women's consistent practices, it can be inferred that the later foot-bound men who followed suit were about ?!
The so-called three exposures refer to exposing the breasts in the front, buttocks in the back, and private parts in the bottom.
Don't look at what I said with vulgar, vulgar, and indecent thinking. In the picture in "Private Life", the women in medieval Europe were dressed in the real way: well-decorated and outspoken. I can't illustrate this kind of dress, so I can only ask you to make up your own imagination. The so-called "rigorously decorated and outspoken" refers to those women whose costumes and other parts are completely designed, but their breasts, buttocks and private parts are deliberately exposed.
As I write this, I think of those so-called new women and new women who think they are leading the trend on the street, and I really laugh out loud. These so-called fashionistas and trendsetters, who are more than a thousand years behind the Middle Ages, still complacently think that they are advanced!
Ordinarily, under the current social background, the atmosphere in which women are forced to "expose" no longer exists. So, is this behavior of constantly exposing the body parts of those animal sex characteristics self-praise, self-show off, or self-indulgence? Derogation, self-contempt? Whether these exposures can really be equated with "beauty" remains to be discussed and debated.
It seems a bit ironic to promote women's rights while losing oneself in fashion and trends.
Modern independent women probably don¡¯t need to deliberately please men anymore. Binding feet and unlimited ¡°exposure¡± are actually harms to women. One is to harm the natural body and the other is to harm the independent spirit.
(End of the full text) (Remember the website URL: www.hlnovel.com