Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading

Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in hlnovel.com -> Prose -> Hello Miss Lawyer

Chapter 533 Motor Vehicle Traffic Accident Liability Disputes (6)

Previous page        Return to Catalog        Next page

    ?

    Wang Meng said: "The defendant cross-examined the evidence submitted by the plaintiff."

    Lin Ziyao said: "There is no objection to the authenticity of the first evidence submitted by the plaintiff, the "Traffic Accident Liability Confirmation", but there is objection to the object of proof. The "Traffic Accident Liability Confirmation" contains the process of the accident. Sun Yue  After the accident while driving a motor vehicle, the plaintiff, Liu Mei, was thrown out of the car and was injured on her back. This evidence just proves that the plaintiff was a person in the car at the time of the accident, not a person outside the car. The plaintiff was thrown out of the car because of an accident  The results that occurred. There is no objection to the authenticity of the second evidence, but there is objection to the object of proof, and the expenses incurred by the plaintiff¡¯s hospitalization should not be borne by the defendant.¡±

    "The cross-examination is complete." Lin Ziyao said.

    "The defendant presented evidence." Wang Meng said.

    Lin Ziyao said: "The defendant submitted two pieces of evidence to the court. The first piece of evidence is the compulsory traffic insurance contract signed by Sun Yue, the owner of a motor vehicle with the license plate number Huai a2xxxx, and the defendant company. The second piece of evidence is the first contract signed by Sun Yue and the defendant company.  The three party liability insurance contracts, and the two pieces of evidence together prove that when the accident occurred, the defendant was liable for insurance claims only if the person outside the vehicle caused personal injury or property loss due to the driving of the insured and the driver permitted by the insured. Obviously in this case  That's not the case."

    The compulsory traffic insurance contract and the third party liability insurance contract are standard contracts.

    Wang Meng has worked in the front line of civil trials for many years, and is familiar with compulsory traffic insurance contracts and third-party liability insurance contracts. She knows that Lin Ziyao is right.

    However, in this case, the two parties have no dispute over the terms of the contract. The point of dispute is whether the plaintiff is a "person in the vehicle" or a "person outside the vehicle".

    In fact, when reading the case files before the court, including the current trial, Wang Meng tended to think that Liu Mei was "on board the car", and the insurance company's rejection of compensation was reasonable.

    But everyone has a heart of compassion. Seeing Liu Mei's miserable state wrapped in gauze, it is impossible for Wang Meng not to be touched.

    "The plaintiff cross-examined the evidence submitted by the defendant." Wang Meng told Chen Rui.

    Chen Rui said: "There is no objection to the authenticity of the two pieces of evidence submitted by the plaintiff and the object of the proof. In this accident, the plaintiff was the person outside the car who was thrown out of the car, echoing the victim of the compulsory traffic insurance contract and third-party liability insurance.  According to the definition of the party, the defendant should settle the claim according to the claim application filed by the plaintiff.¡±

    Wang Meng said: "Do the two sides have anything to add to the factual part?"

    Chen Rui asked Liu Mei in a low voice, and Liu Mei looked at Wang Meng again with tears in her eyes, and shook her head slightly.

    He hesitated to speak, but I felt sorry for him.

    Wang Meng's brows moved.

    Chen Rui said: "The plaintiff has nothing to add."

    Lin Ziyao said bluntly: "The defendant did not add anything."

    Wang Meng said: "The next step is to enter the debate, and the plaintiff is invited to express his opinions first."

    Chen Rui said: "Dear presiding judge, I am speaking on behalf of the plaintiff. The facts of this case are clear and the evidence is sufficient. After a traffic accident, the plaintiff was unfortunately thrown out of the car in which he was riding, causing serious injuries. The accident  The moment it happened, the plaintiff has changed from the person in the car to the person outside the car, echoing the definition of the victim of the compulsory traffic accident insurance and the third party liability insurance, and requesting the court to confirm it.¡±

    Chen Rui paused, and continued: "The defendant's lawyer has been emphasizing the concept of people outside the vehicle. The defendant believes that the so-called people outside the vehicle should be people who have been outside the vehicle until the end." (Remember the website website: www  .hlnovel.com
Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report