When writing about the real things around you, it should be regarded as prose, but prose is also divided into different directions, with primary and secondary points. When I was studying, I never knew composition, and I had no concept of the difference between different types of articles. Recently, I discovered that there is a big difference between describing scenery and narrative, and there is also a difference between purely describing scenery and purely narrative, and speaking philosophical thinking . Judging from past writing experience, narrative is really not my favorite way of writing. Words always describe scenery involuntarily and meticulously. From this point of view, I prefer to describe scenery. However, it is meaningless to describe the scenery for the sake of describing the scenery, but the past texts can't help but point to the description of the scenery, which also shows that I like this in my heart, but why? What I can think of so far is that the original intention of writing scenery is not a description of scenery, but an instinctive pursuit of beauty. But what about philosophy? Scenery will give beauty, philosophical thinking will give thought and soul, obviously philosophical thinking is the end of the pursuit. Therefore, in fact, I want my soul to be nurtured by nature and give birth to smart philosophical thinking from it.
Regarding writing articles, remember one of Thoreau's points of view: keep asking yourself, what does it mean to you to walk into the mountains? Your essay isn't good until you've included all the important elements. (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com