Today, I followed the navigation and walked to the library. I plan to read books there for a few hours, change the way of reading books, see the writing styles of different writers, and also look at various possible writing styles. Walking to the end of a small alley, the navigation said: The destination is on the current road, and this navigation is over. But in front of him is a temporary construction site door, which looks rough but is locked tightly. This is really a "dead end". In this case, the navigation is no longer useful, so you can only rely on yourself, go back along the road, then take a detour at a fork in the road, walk for a while, find the location of the library, and find that the door before is at the entrance of the library, it seems that the navigation It's not deceiving.
After wandering around in the library, I found some books collecting ancient paintings based on my feeling, so I opened them to take a look. Originally I wanted to see the fine brushwork paintings of the Song Dynasty, but later I found a collection of Zheng Banqiao's paintings. The bamboo orchid paintings are very good. Although I don't know how to appreciate them, I feel very good when I look at them. Later, I did find flower-and-bird paintings and landscape paintings from the Song Dynasty, but I still prefer Zheng Banqiao's bamboo. In the middle, I quickly flipped through a few landscape paintings of the Qing Dynasty. How should I put it, it is too cumbersome and I don¡¯t think much about it. I also read a Japanese Ukiyo-style painting book, which painted some flowers, but I didn't see any tricks. When looking at the paintings, I thought of an unreasonable truth. Although the forms of expression of literature, paintings, and handicrafts vary widely, their meanings are actually interlinked. Just like Zheng Banqiao¡¯s bamboos, there is a sense of beauty, strong and strong. Free and easy, in terms of the painter's performance, the bamboo leaves are densely packed, and one or two branches are faintly scattered in the blank space, filling the gap and leaving an aftertaste; these expressions correspond to the writing style, which is vigorous and free and easy , some parts need to be carefully described, and some parts only need a few words, but they are meaningful. Later, I saw a sentence in a collection of oil paintings, which can give some small explanations for the above principles. The consciousness of that sentence is probably that Impressionists are not painting scenery, but painting the feeling of the painter. This is the reason, maybe this is the law you follow in a daze, this kind of law is obviously much better than many techniques, but now due to practical reasons, almost no one visits it. I also saw a sentence in the collection of oil paintings that stirred your heart, and recorded it here:
For me, no one taught me anything. When a person places himself in front of nature, if he can get out of the predicament, he will be able to form his own style naturally. ¡ª¡ª Camille Corot
Not only painting, but writing must also be the same. This may be the reason why you want to leave, walk into the face of nature, face it, face yourself, and then find your own style, and see what you can really convince yourself.
Later, I left the painting area and came to the area of ??modern and contemporary literature. Speaking of it, I really have to complain about it. There are really too few books in this part. There are very few authors in the collection, and the books of each author are pitifully small. Many authors don't see it. From these aspects, it is really not suitable to find and collect various creative methods here. If the amount is not enough, you may have to try the National Library.
Judging from some impressions I got from reading a few books in a hurry, poetry is useless, and I can't grasp the point at all. But Wang Guozhen¡¯s poems are quite watery, and there is another book about the genre, I forgot, anyway, it¡¯s some chicken soup for the soul, it¡¯s quite refreshing to read, and I feel comfortable, but think about what these articles can bring to you , really nothing, the way the article is written does not give you any inspiration, the content of the article seems to make sense, but it is far from the real thought, there is a point of view that suffering is good for people, but for The country is not good. It is good for people because it can sharpen people. If it is not good for the country, it cites the turmoil at that time. The examples he chose for people and countries are not at the same level. For a country where the mountains and rivers are in turmoil and the people are in dire straits, if a person¡¯s family is slaughtered, that person will still suffer irreparable humiliation, and only one life is left. It is an opportunity, but stop listing here, it is not necessarily the same suffering for a person and a country. Besides, the Chinese nation has suffered a period of humiliation. Although we have paid a huge price, including the lives of countless Chinese people, but from the present point of view, this period of suffering is indeed giving birth to a new China. If there is no such thing, China is definitely still in the ancient feudal society, the society is still corrupt, the bureaucracy is still rampant, the people are still enslaved, and there is still no hope for this country.
Speaking of Zhu Ziqing, he is really good at writing prose. After skimming through one or two articles, he turned to the "back view" article, read it quickly, and then read it again. It was the part where his father climbed over the railing. Thinking about it, some sentences from this part should be recited in the textbook. I don't remember the time when I was in class. After all, as a pure science student, I don't pay much attention to Chinese. Now imagining the way of class, it is nothing more than how the article expresses the love of the father, and how it shows that "I" is moved by the love of the father.?Which sentence is used very well, which word is used very expressively. Really, sometimes I feel that the words that record the truth are boundless, but we spend all day studying which word to use well. Our teachers are talking about what fatherly love, motherly love, and nostalgia are expressed in these articles, but the philosophy of life is not. No one teaches, but the philosophy class opened is talking about the concept of a word all day long, but almost no one teaches real philosophical thinking. When I look at the people around me and the words written by the current people, I feel that deep in the desert, there is no source of water, and the source of life is almost drained. Later, I actually felt that the thoughts of all the books I read were so thin, and I didn't know what gave me such confidence. Having said that, the writing method of Zhu Ziqing's article should be of reference value to the present, and should be studied carefully. However, judging from the few articles I read, there are a lot of dialogues, and it looks like a novel at first glance. He said in the preface that some people say that some of his prose are novels, and there may be a reason for it.
Later, in a preface to Lao She¡¯s article, a researcher carefully analyzed and compared the articles of Lu Xun, Contradictions, Ba Jin, and Lao She. Among them, six modern writers were mentioned¡ª¡°Lu, Guo, Mao, Ba, She, Cao", and then analyzed a way of thinking that made you a little bit concerned-the political nature of the article, which said that it was going all the way to the Pacific Ocean, so it can be seen that this researcher is really annoying Yes, it is very annoying to watch, so I haven't finished reading that part of the preface. Judging from what I read, because the author is too convoluted and unwilling to give a clear statement, so I can only judge based on his tone: Guo Moruo's literary talent is good, but he is flattering; Ba Jin's propaganda is too serious and political. Too strong; the political nature of Lao She's articles also exists, but because there is a title, his articles can be separated from political nature to a certain extent, and have the value of studying literature. Even so, the characters in his articles There is a problem with his artistic image - he has a biased understanding of the revolution. Anyway, after all that has been said, it is nothing more than to say that he is actually not that bad, and that he still has research value.
I don¡¯t know if it¡¯s my standard of comparison or what¡¯s the reason, but I always feel that there are big problems in domestic literature. They are too constrained by external factors, and there is no way to get rid of them so that they can truly think and There is no way to honestly express a person's true understanding of the world. Judging from the articles of many famous literati, their themes are wrong. As far as I am concerned now, real literature is about deep thinking, the kind of truly supreme thought, which is a person¡¯s thinking about life, not out of family and country feelings, nor is it highly skilled lyricism, such as what Loving the country, loving parents, loving children, loving one's hometown, etc., are the thoughts of people like Nietzsche and Thoreau. In China, Zhuangzi counts. The kind of words that come out of the feelings of family and country, out of responsibility and responsibility, are missing something, something very important, so I think they have a problem.
Another thing I want to say is that we can actually reshape a person's soul by reading a writer's literary works¡ªthis is tentatively called the collection of scattered souls.
It seems that this is a good way to turn over the book, think, and then record the content of thinking in time-it has nothing to do anyway. This kind of book flipping should first presuppose one or two purposes: to see the writing method, the author's style, and the author's heart. (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com