The beginning of each article or the beginning of each subtitle will not start for no reason, and in most cases it will not start directly from the beginning. The most common situation I see now is to start with a scene, then lead out the protagonist, and then slowly tell the story of the protagonist from the beginning.
There are about 3 ideas for character writing that come to mind:
The first type: use some current pictures as the beginning, lead to the following text, and then start from the beginning, usually telling a specific case, and write back to the events related to the beginning at the end, and then write about the general Making a summary of the event is equivalent to making a summary, explaining some supplementary but not particularly important scattered information, and a strong point at the end. This method of writing generally sees the details by describing a specific example, and after writing the process of that example, the ins and outs of the incident are clearly explained.
The second type: a concluding introduction, and then eloquently, until the end. The difference between this and the first one is that this eloquent talk is based on the overall event, while the above one is based on the event of a specific example.
The third type: the introduction, and then divide it into 3 subheadings, and write from 3 themes.
It seems that the rule of the beginning is, no matter what, it is necessary to use another shot as the beginning anyway, no matter whether the scene is transferred from the location or the argument, and then transferred to the protagonist of the article. Then explain the ins and outs of the matter, make a statistical summary at the end, and finally end with a point.
Thinking about it, the people who wrote these reports are all very experienced people. They have written a lot of articles and have a fixed writing mode. From these articles, we can learn very common writing methods. How they conceived in an article, how it started, how it ended, and how it explained in the middle, almost all of them were fixed patterns. Then the people who write these articles are very proficient in the use of these formats.
So at this point, there is no need to collect reports from Kim Chun-seop. The learning of character writing methods can also come to an end.
Combing the way of ending:
The most commonly used one is to use a sentence said by the protagonist, which can represent his spirit and is infectious. There is another kind of author to ask questions. There is also a direct summary of the achievements of the characters and what honors they have won. There is another kind that is less used, it should be to highlight him with a sentence related to the protagonist said by others. Another way is to end with a simple scene that gives people a meaningful feeling.
It can be seen that there should be three kinds of endings in your future writing: what the protagonist says, the author uses his own words to make a point, and a simple scene.
Quite a normal report, there is nothing particularly worthy of praise, and there is nothing particularly worthy of criticism.
Introduction, because it is a manuscript sent back from the scene, so write some descriptions of the scene, then make a general summary, and then start from the beginning.
Tell me about the situation of Tong Changrong, the owner of the first tombstone, and then talk about the various funding forces.
Tell me about the owner of the last tombstone, and then talk about the difficulties Kim Chun-seop encountered and overcame during the process of erecting the monument.
Let me talk about some unusual examples, foreigners who have contributed to China's anti-war comrades.
In fact, it is packaged, the cause of the monument, the first person who erected the monument, what difficulties were encountered in the process of erecting the monument, what are the achievements, 77 tombstones in 10 years. It is to use some methods to package these points.
There is one place to pay attention to, and see how each family writes why Jin Chunxie erected a monument. The reason here is that heroes who sacrificed their lives for the victory of the war should not be forgotten, and his tombstones were so cold, he felt very sad.
This article is very well written. Intuitively think that this article can inspire the writing of the article.
The background information of the characters did not open up another paragraph to speak slowly, but was summarized in one sentence and added to the time being narrated. By the way, I did not stop to explain the background, but added a simple summary to the event being described, which has a coherent effect. In addition, there are some old or digital information in it juxtaposed and briefly explained, leaving space for the details of the incident that happened to Kim Chunxie. At the end, I gave a paragraph explaining the meaning of Tong Changrong's cemetery and the number of monuments, which feels very good.
From here, another writing method can be summarized:
Information can be divided into two types, one is blunt background information, and the other is specific events (possible events need to be classified, specifically, the focus should be on using the ones related to the characters in the article, or the ones that are happening). Then in the process of writing, the blunt information can be briefly summarized. It is best to summarize them together by juxtaposition, and then?Insert events in the narration without interrupting the progress of the narration, and the time of the narration can be more detailed. There are others, the analysis of the analysis, the point of the point.
Of course, maybe the author didn't think so complicated at all.
This summary is very good. When I watched it again, I felt that it was the same thing, and it seemed that it was not as good as the first instinct.
?Summary of ideas: From a poem to Jilin, from Jilin to Yanbian, from Yanbian to the red tourism base, and from the red tourism base to the character Jin Chunxie. Then, in order, the reasons for building the monument, the difficulties involved, and then an example, and then a general summary of the building of the monument, and then summarizing the works, building websites, red patriotic education for children, etc. Anyway, what I have done is worthwhile Everything said is summed up.
It seems that the rule of the beginning is, no matter what, it is necessary to use another shot as the beginning anyway, no matter whether the scene is transferred from the location or the argument, and then transferred to the protagonist of the article. Then explain the ins and outs of the matter, make a statistical summary at the end, and finally end with a point.
This summary is very clean and organized very well.
Summary of article conception: discuss and reason, draw out the protagonist, and then start from the cause, reason, purpose, talk about the difficulty of doing this, talk about the sacrifices made for this, and then use a sentence to lead a topic , Let me give an example at the beginning, this article will generally use Tong Changrong, and then make a summary, a summary of the monument, and a summary of other things in a parallel form in one or two sentences, and then end. There are always words that almost the protagonist has said.
Very standard beginning: a scene, summarizing the deeds of the protagonist, and then pointing out the main purpose of the article, using a promotional approach.
The first two thirds are erected monuments, and the back third are erected biography.
Thinking about it, the people who wrote these reports are all very experienced people. They have written a lot of articles and have a fixed writing mode. From these articles, we can learn very common writing methods. How they conceived in an article, how it started, how it ended, and how it explained in the middle, almost all of them were fixed patterns. Then the people who write these articles are very proficient in the use of these formats.
So at this point, there is no need to collect reports from Kim Chun-seop. The learning of character writing methods can also come to an end. (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com