From other articles, it can probably be felt that spending a lot of pen and ink to describe the plants and trees of the environment in detail can easily lead to the opposite result. Maybe the article was intended to be moist, but it made the article too dry. However, Thoreau's Walden Pond is also a description of a large number of scenery, but it does not feel boring at all. Is it because some descriptions of society and human nature are added after the description of scenery? From this rise to the height of philosophical thinking? What's more, the jump between his scenes is really too big. Is this the credit of the stream of consciousness? (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com