Possibly what is said is true: truly brilliant writing is unskilled.
The reasons I can think of now are as follows:
A truly superb article is full of thoughts. Compared with thoughts, the text is so thin that it is almost invisible, just like transparent. The whole article is full of thoughts, and the direction of the article follows the thoughts. The thoughts are so full that there is no A trace of space that can accommodate redundant things such as the structure, pattern, expression method, and expression technique of the article. Articles have space. The so-called methods actually occupy space. When we conceive, layout, and modify, we actually draw a hole in a space, and then put the corresponding things into the corresponding hole. Some people put them in the hole. There are more things in it, some people put less in it, some people add some fancy things to deceive people with visual effects, some people throw a bunch of things around, making people dazzled and mistakenly think that there are many treasures inside. But other people, without dividing the pit, put things directly in it, kept putting it in, kept putting it in, and the whole space was crowded. At this time, two phenomena will appear, and the decisive factor of these two phenomena is the inside. Throwing something, if it is inferior products, or useless garbage, then it is just garbage piled up; the other is that it is filled with high-quality gold, and the whole space will be shining and extremely dazzling . So, it's useless. Skills show that the ideas and content are still too thin, and they need to be supplemented by other things before they dare to show them to others. (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com