Ideological. It is disgusting to record a bunch of trifles, and describe all kinds of trivia in large pieces in words, so as to show the writing style, which is even more annoying.
Argument. I thought I liked the description, but now it seems that, to a certain extent, the theory is more attractive to you.
Look at the form. So don't look at the content, look at the form. Those who record trivial matters should focus on how they are written; those who read discussions should focus on how they are discussed.
Come at your fingertips. A person who can really talk about it is really knowledgeable and can use it at his fingertips. He can cite examples of time and space and distance very skillfully. There is a natural feeling there, as if he is very familiar with those things, so familiar that he does not know others Not familiar with those things. Randomly mention people or things or things that no one else knows, and use them directly as a symbol of a certain range without explanation; Deliberately showing off the taste. It really does feel different.
beautiful. In terms of the beauty of the article, it still needs to rhyme and have a poetic style of writing.
so,
Lin Yutang's Theory.
Yu Dafu, described by Guo Moruo.
I used to think that I needed to practice my pen, but I didn¡¯t know what to write, so I was waiting for the opportunity at work, let the bamboo pole of work catch up the unskilled duck on the shelf, now thinking about it, it¡¯s really ridiculous, I can¡¯t dance, and I was pushed to the stage Still can't jump.
¡ª¡ªThis should be your writing style (you need to confirm various writing techniques). News reports should not allow this method, so if you want to continue to deal with words, your path should be another way, but you should not be a literati, but rather a rebellious thinker¡ªthat¡¯s how it is. (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com