This in part led to his enlightenment being world class.
What about China? During the American Revolution, the 18th century was China's late Ming and early Qing, right? What did the Chinese people play creatively in the late Ming and early Qing Dynasties? market? And some are creative inventions, right? The economic foundation of these things is not good, we are also very harmonious, the society is harmonious, is there any sprout of capitalism in it, right? So are there any discordant factors in political thinking? A rational guy actually suspects that Confucius hates.
China's democratic enlightenment thinkers, right? Is there a collision too? But because the superstructure is too grand and too small, the three sparks will disappear when they go out, and the gods in China are just clouds.
An aristocrat born in the middle and lower class is the middle and lower class of the aristocracy, considered a small and middle aristocrat, but he has received a good education and is still a member of the ruling class, right? It is a linguist, a great writer, a poet, a playwright, a thinker, a statesman, and a theorist
He is also a historian, he has the famous historiography of the Louis 14th era.
Absolutely in such an era, Voltaire is an amazing art, so in the process of its formation, he once saw China's constitutional monarchy.
Therefore, he thinks that America should learn from Eagle Country, and should make the monarchy autocratic, but he believes that there must be a transition period from absolute autocracy to constitutional monarchy democracy
His mother is Ma Jiahui.
against authoritarian government, he will do anything.
such a person.
America's history.
In the history of modern human thought.
Let's take a look at his academics.
For example, his attack on the Catholic Church is an advocacy of constitutional monarchy and natural human rights. We just said what are the most basic rights of natural human rights? Right to life, right to liberty, right to property and a bunch of natural rights related to that, right? There are three main ones, which are called natural talents. Natural human rights are endowed by God and are inalienable and inalienable in the world
it's a heavy word.
Everyone is equal before the law. Looking back, when we talked about the Reformation, we said that one of his greatest achievements was to realize that everyone is equal before God. The concept of equality is that everyone is equal before God. Everyone believes in it. Son of God, if God does not come to the world, how should we, who are originally equal, get along in the world? People who can be graded to be equal form a human society and form a country. We need a power higher than us to manage us and serve us, right? Then we have to transfer some of the rights, but the person we transfer the rights to must understand that the value of its existence is to protect my natural human rights.
Let the people use the law before the law instead of anyone as our ruler.
These ideas are very advanced.
I would like to recommend the following sentence in French, I saw idonotagreewith, theworldthatyousay, to, therighttosay.
English is not as good as Chinese, I don't agree with everything you say, but I will defend to the death your right to speak.
Has anyone heard this line in this song? I never heard it in high school.
I've heard this phrase, the first time I heard it was almost 20 years ago in 1991 and I remember it very well, I was sitting in row 3 in an elective class on the history of modern world thought In a certain position, I didn't intend to listen to the class that day, but what the teacher said on it, I basically.
He said about Voltaire, I don't agree with every word you said, I don't understand every word you said, but I will defend to the death your right to say it, and I still remember how I felt.
A white light, I feel that my mind and my heart become extremely clear, clear and clear, I know now someone asks me, what do you think is the best state, I made up a word.
clarity.
psychic like this.
It depends on your strength.
But what is powerful is me now.
When I calm down and think about this sentence rationally, we can also do an analysis. I disagree with every word you said. What do you mean? Opinions are completely opposite, if we are not fighting each other on the street, face-grabbing hooligans, we are arguing.
Keeping a debating stance, if I disagree with every word you say, can it be deduced, I think I am all right and you are all wrong.
as long as i don'tIt is deliberate quibbling, if we are in a formal debate, I disagree with every word you say, but what does the second half of the sentence mean, I will defend you at the cost of my right person's life, say the wrong thing right, I'm the right person to die, to die for your bullshit.
If someone dares to restrain your nonsense, I will fight her to the death.
no need.
If I am correct, I should pat the table (Remember this site URL: www.hlnovel.com