How to add one to share the copyright as a co-author. Consensus, joint exercise of copyright can not be reached through consensus now. Both Party A and Party B have the right to exercise any one of the rights and interests except for the transfer of copyright. Therefore, A uploaded the novel to the Internet without your permission, which is an act of information network dissemination of the work. Does not constitute one-to-one. You who jointly enjoy the copyright of the cooperative work do not infringe the copyright by setting a link to A's blog, since. Since A's uploaded behavior is not infringing. As the copyright shared by co-authors, the act of setting up links will not constitute infringement. Similarly, Ding did not infringe Ding's copying and distribution of works. He had false consent from the co-authors, and that was enough! come on! In addition, when a consensus cannot be reached through negotiation, Jia has the right to inadvertently allow others to copy the work. Hairstyle, but the proceeds should be reasonably distributed. a The right to publish and the right to disseminate information on the network of hydrogen, helium and lithium. Group photo works cannot be used separately. Home Youquan inadvertently allows the exercise of any copyright other than transfer, including publication and information network dissemination. Uploading it to the Internet by a fake fan does not constitute a claim against B. Violation of commonly shared copyright, hence a mistake. Closing the screen slightly damages the right to disseminate information on the home network. The act of uploading by A does not constitute the following. Infringement of copyright jointly enjoyed by cooperative works. The act of setting a link does not exist, and the assistance and expansion of the infringement will not constitute infringement. Shaidi, like A and B, sent a golf preparatory act, which constituted an infringement. And with the false permission of the co-authors, they have the right to reproduce and distribute. It does not constitute an infringement of the copyright shared by a pair of cooperative works. The reproduction and distribution rights of Qinghaili Fifth Publishing House. this. Look, he is wrong, I was wrong just now, whoever chooses this bass, he reposted this article to his own blog without the permission of anyone in A and B, so staring at such a Act, which constitutes the right to information network dissemination of works. He did not seek the consent of any of his collaborators. Therefore Ding. He chooses. The Zhuzhou group has already sent the reward, but it still violates the right of information network dissemination among copyrights, so it is correct. My behavior does not constitute infringement, because it has been copied and distributed by the collaborators. The conduct of the service does not constitute infringement, so d is wrong. The answer to this question is C. The second is the attribution of the copyright of untrusted works. a principle. Two exceptions. principles of copyright law. Article 17. A work commissioned by B. Who does the copyright belong to? If the trustor A trustee has an agreement, follow the agreement. If there is no agreement, the copyright belongs to the trustee Ai. What rights does the client's hometown have? He wants to keep Xiong's money free of charge forever within the agreed scope of use. There is no agreement that the consignor can use it for free within the scope of the entrusted creation purpose. For example, A entrusts B to design a trademark for himself. A trademark without design is a work of originality. But there is no agreement on the ownership of the copyright in the family, so the copyright belongs to the cat. Huh? However, Jia Xiang enjoys free use within the scope of the agreed use of this trademark as a trademark. Reproduction, distribution, information, and network dissemination do not require the game to be registered and confirmed. This is the principle, with two exceptions. Requirements to pick. Copyright Infringement, Copyright Dispute Interpretation Articles 13 and 14. Rule 14 of the first week. A living person commissions a biographical work for himself. What is an autobiographical work? It is a biography narrated in the first person. "The First Half of My Life", what Liu Xiaoqing and I have to say Please entrust B to create an autobiography for himself. Timely autobiographical work. So who owns the copyright of this autobiographical work? If there is an agreement between the client A and the trustee but there is no agreement, the copyright belongs to the specific person and the client A. This is an exception. The second exception. To give a hug. The second exception, this is Article 13 of the Interpretation, which was written by someone else. Reviewed and finalized by myself b Reports, speeches and other works published in my own name. Who owns his copyright? A secretary writes. However, because the leaders have the reports and speeches published by the leaders in the name of the leaders. Who owns his copyright? The copyright of a work constituting a legal person belongs to the legal person. The copyright of the work that does not constitute a legal person belongs to the reporter and speaker. Speakers and speeches. Then the author can pay the appropriate compensation. There is a team of secretaries to write. There is a report published by my own family who has reviewed and finalized it in my false name, and the speech is the ownership of the copyright. If it belongs to the legal person work of the leader's unit, then of course the copyright belongs to the unit. No, anyway, the copyright of the work belongs to the speaker. ah? The actual authors can then be paid appropriately. Keep it short. Question 17 of 2006. (Remember this site URL: www.hlnovel.com